2013 Jan 29;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-20. Full bibliographic reference: Wong G, Westhorp G, Manzano A, Greenhalgh J, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations. Wong 2013 RAMESES Realist.pdf. We hope to build a community that enables peer-to-peer knowledge construction leading ultimately to community members having greater understanding and competence in undertaking these types of reviews. Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project Geoff Wong,1* Gill Westhorp,2 Joanne Greenhalgh,3 Ana Manzano,3 Justin Jagosh4 and Trisha Greenhalgh1 1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Programme theory (ideas and assumptions of how a particular intervention works) development is the first step in a realist evaluation or a realist synthesis, with literature reviews providing important evidence to support this. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES II project. Realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services and other fields of research and evaluation. Responsibilities. NIH Keywords: Content available from CC BY 2.0: RAMESES publication standards: Realist syntheses.pdf. 10/1008/07/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom, HS&DR/14/19/19/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom. The project's aim is to produce initial reporting standards for realist … Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Results: Its overall place in the toolkit of evaluation approaches is not yet fully established. Through discussion within the project team, we developed a list of issues related to quality that needed to be addressed when carrying out realist evaluations. Advancing the application of systems thinking in health: realist evaluation of the Leadership Development Programme for district manager decision-making in Ghana. RAMESES II - developed quality and reporting standards and resources and training materials for realist evaluation. Director Postgraduate Research Studies; Director Advanced Qualitative Research Methods Training (AQUALM) ESRC White Rose DTP; Research interests BMJ. BMC Med. The RAMESES II reporting guidelines for realist evaluations is an important initiative to ensure these evaluations are reported in sufficient detail, in the context of existing evidence, and with a rating of strength of evidence for main findings that will greatly assist users of the evaluations. 2015;350:h1258. Realist methodologies are increasingly being used to evaluate complex interventions in health and social care. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Realist evaluation is an increasingly popular methodology in health services research. We: More details on the RAMESES project's methods may be found at: a) Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES)http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/115, b) Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses - Evolving Standards) projecthttp://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/volume-2/issue-30. RAMESES II. Once the panel members had provided their feedback on our briefing materials, we constructed a set of items for potential inclusion in the reporting standards and circulated these online to panel members. Realist evaluation for programs and services in the health area: an integrative review of the theoretical and methodological literature. No previous standards exist for reporting realist evaluations. Methods: realist evaluation covering the same kind of project or programme. The RAMESES II reporting guidelines for realist evaluations is an important initiative to ensure these evaluations are reported in sufficient detail, in the context of existing evidence, and with a rating of strength of evidence for main findings that will greatly assist users of the evaluations. A realistic evaluation of fines for hospital discharges: Incorporating the history of programme evaluations in the analysis. Through discussion within the project team, we developed a list of issues related to quality that needed to be addressed when carrying out realist evaluations. In this project we used a number of different approaches to develop our project outputs. We used a realist evaluation approach, guided by RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluation . 004635298f4efaa661000000.pdf. 1 RAMESES II provides guidance on quality assurance and uniform reporting for improving quality and consistency of realist evaluation studies (Wong et al., 2017). For realist evaluations (RE) this project aims to: develop quality and reporting standards and training materials; build capacity for undertaking and critically evaluating them; produce resources and training materials for lay participants, and those seeking to involve them. There is growing interest in realist synthesis as an alternative systematic review method. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. 2013 Jan 29;11:21. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-21. In addition, the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) was adhered to . About Justin Jagosh: I served as a Senior Research Fellow at the University of Liverpool from 2013 to 2017 and during that time was involved in a number of research contracts involving Realist Methodology, including the NIHR-funded RAMESES II project to develop quality and reporting guidelines for Realist Evaluation. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037224. Wong G, Westhorp G, Greenhalgh J, Manzano A, Jagosh J, Greenhalgh T. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Oct. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J, Pawson R. BMC Med. 2020 Nov 1;35(Supplement_2):ii9-ii21. collated and summarised existing literature on the principles of good practice in realist and meta-narrative systematic review; considered the extent to which these principles have been followed by published and in-progress reviews, thereby identifying how rigour may be lost and how existing methods could be improved; used an online Delphi method with an interdisciplinary panel of experts from academia and policy, produce a draft set of methodological steps and publication standards; produced training materials with learning outcomes linked to these steps; piloted these standards and training materials prospectively on real reviews-in-progress, capturing methodological and other challenges as they arise; synthesised expert input, evidence review and real-time problem analysis into more definitive guidance and standards. This approach offers the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas -for example, by explaining the success, failure or mixed fortunes of complex interventions. Language: English: PubMed ID: 27342217: Relevant URLs (full-text if available) Epub 2013 Jan 29. Introduction Realist evaluation is an increasingly popular methodology in health services research. This can include field research, interviews, focus groups 2 Acronym of ‘Community Orientated and Opportunity Learning Music’ project. Realist evaluation is a specific theoretical and methodological approach, and should be carefully distinguished from evaluation… Data is collected from primary sources. Gill was a member of the Rameses research teams which developed the international publication standards and quality standards for realist evaluation and realist literature review. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa128. The realist evaluation approach is a relatively new approach to evaluation, especially in some fields (such as health services research). -. Realist evaluation reports need to be developed in line with the realist nature of the evaluation. Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES (Realist And MEta‐narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) project. 2014;12:29. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-29. Get the latest public health information from CDC: https://www.coronavirus.gov. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040397. eCollection 2020. RAMESES : Hide Latest Messages. We also drew on our collective experience as realist evaluators, in training and supporting realist evaluations, and on the RAMESES email list to help us develop the briefing materials.  |  Reporting realist evaluations. The project's aim is to produce initial reporting standards for realist evaluations. Please feel free to use these cartoons (they have been uploaded as full size images which you can save to your computer). 2013 May;69(5):1005-22. doi: 10.1111/jan.12095. Within three rounds our Delphi panel was able to reach consensus on 20 items that should be included in the reporting standards for realist evaluations. Panel members were asked to rank each potential item twice on a 7-point Likert scale, once for relevance and once for validity. RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. The projects' goals are to produce quality and publication standards and training materials for realist research approaches. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Sep. BMC Med. This approach was used because a simple binary of success and failure is sometimes unhelpful when evaluating the complexities of changing services and systems [ 14 ]. BMC Med. Manzi F, Marchant T, Hanson C, Schellenberg J, Mkumbo E, Mlaguzi M, Tancred T. Health Policy Plan. HHS Conclusions. Harnessing the health systems strengthening potential of quality improvement using realist evaluation: an example from southern Tanzania. G U I D E L I N E Open Access. Uptake and use of a minimum data set (MDS) for older people living and dying in care homes in England: a realist review protocol. Health Res Policy Syst. There is growing interest in theory-driven, qualitative and mixed-method approaches to systematic review as an alternative to (or to extend and supplement) conventional Cochrane-style reviews. These reporting standards for realist evaluations have been developed by drawing on a range of sources. As part of the RAMESES II project we commissioned an illustrator, Chris Lysy of freshspecturm to provide us with cartoons for the resources and training materials for realist evaluations that had a realist twist. 2020 Oct 16;10(10):e037224. No previous standards exist for reporting realist evaluations. Pawson R. The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. doi: 10.1177/1356389010389913. For realist evaluations (RE) this project aims to: develop quality and reporting standards and training materials; build capacity for undertaking and critically evaluating them; produce resources and training materials for lay participants, and those seeking to involve them. He runs an on-going programme of introductory and advanced level workshops on realist methodology including an annual Summer School. Its overall place in the toolkit of evaluation approaches is not yet fully established. The overall response rates for all items for rounds 1, 2 and 3 were 94 %, 76 % and 80 %, respectively. As with all primary research approaches, guidance on quality assurance and uniform reporting is an important step towards improving quality and consistency of studies. These approaches offer the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas - for example by explaining the success, failure or mixed fortunes of complex interventions. They were also encouraged to provide free text comments.  |  Realist evaluation is, as the name implies, a form of evaluation. -, Manzano-Santaella A. You can contact me at gill@communitymatters.com.au if you want to discuss this further. There are hundreds of members and they are very good about providing advice and support. More details on the RAMESES II project's methods may be found at: a) Protocol the RAMESES II study:developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluationhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/8/e008567, b) Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II projecthttps://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/hsdr05280/#/abstract, Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/115, http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/volume-2/issue-30, http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/8/e008567. No previous standards exist for reporting realist evaluations. The two most commonly described are induction, or inductive reasoning, and deduction, or deductive reasoning. We also drew on our collective experience as realist evaluators, in training and supporting realist evaluations, and on the RAMESES email list to help us develop the briefing materials. RAMESES II Quality Standards for Realist Evaluation: For funders or commissioners of realist evaluations Resources and training materials for realist evaluation We have provided the resources and training materials in the order below as a guide to those who are starting out on their journey to learn about realist evaluation. I heartily endorse Alice's suggestion of joining the Rameses discussion list. Introduction: Realist evaluation is an increasingly popular methodology in health services research. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews. We prepared the briefing materials for our Delphi panel by summarising the most recent literature on realist evaluations to identify how and why rigour had been demonstrated and where gaps in expertise and rigour were evident. This list is for researchers interested in learning about realist and meta-narrative reviews. Retroduction in realist evaluation The RAMESES II Project What is retroduction? No previous publication standards exist for reporting realist syntheses. Get the latest research from NIH: https://www.nih.gov/coronavirus. Brown S, Dalkin SM, Bate A, Bradford R, Allen C, Brittain K, Clarke A, Hand A. BMJ Open. A Realist Evaluation of Theory about Triggers for Doctors Choosing a Generalist or Specialist Medical Career. realist evaluation. Delphi approach; Realist evaluation; Reporting guidelines. USA.gov. Thus, its focus is on not just whether or not a programme such as an NZ regional DHB grouping ‘works’ but how, for whom and in what contexts it ‘works’. I am part of the pioneering research group (RAMESES II) developing methodological standards in realist evaluation methods. NLM You can view the full series of cartoons on the Rameses website, along with a number of other great resources about realist evaluation, including Ray Pawson's video series. Justin is a consultant and co-app on numerous projects using realist methodology and was a co-investigator on the RAMESES II project to develop quality guidelines and reporting standards for Realist Evaluation. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES II project. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES II project. No previous standards exist for reporting realist evaluations. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3933.3255. 2016;14(1):96. The RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) project has produced: for those seeking to use the realist and/or meta-narrative approach to systematic review. Conclusion: Exploring and understanding the scope and value of the Parkinson's nurse in the UK (The USP Project): a realist economic evaluation protocol. Realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services and other fields of research and evaluation. These were then shared with the panel members and their feedback was sought. RAMESES II - developed quality and reporting standards and resources and training materials for realist evaluation. about Realist Evaluation The RAMESES II Project 1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258. 2020 Nov 14;10(11):e040397. However, the quality of such reviews can be difficult to assess. London: Sage; 2013. This means, among other things, describing theories in terms of context -mechanism outcome (CMO) hypotheses; explicitly discussing disaggregated outcomes for 2020 Nov 18;17(22):8566. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228566. Background: Realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services and other fields of research and evaluation. This site needs JavaScript to work properly. RAMESES I - (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) developed quality and publication standards and training materials for realist reviews and the related approach of meta-narrative reviews. Musa MK, Akdur G, Hanratty B, Kelly S, Gordon A, Peryer G, Spilsbury K, Killett A, Burton J, Meyer J, Fortescue S, Towers AM, Irvine L, Goodman C. BMJ Open. Development of methodological guidance, publication standards and training materials for realist and meta-narrative reviews: the RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses – Evolving Standards) project. Inductive logic derives COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation. Quintans JR, Yonekura T, Trapé CA, Soares CB. J Adv Nurs. The realist evaluation approach is a relatively new approach to evaluation, especially in some fields (such as health services research). London: Sage; 1997. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! Panel members came from a variety of disciplines, sectors and policy fields. Acknowledgements • The quality and reporting standards and training materials for realist evaluation were developed as part of: – The RAMESES II Project – to produce quality and publication Background: Realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services and other fields of research and evaluation. There are different forms of reasoning in research and evaluation. Find NCBI SARS-CoV-2 literature, sequence, and clinical content: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/. Our background searching has shown that some realist evaluations are not flagged as such in the title and may also be inconsistently indexed, and hence are more difficult to locate. I'm a co-author of the Rameses standards for realist evaluation. Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project. Realist evaluation 24 is a theory-driven evaluation approach 25 used to understand how, for whom and in what circumstances an intervention ‘works’ to produce intended outcomes. We recruited 35 panel members from 27 organisations across six countries from nine different disciplines. What is the difference between realist evaluation and realist synthesis? 2011;17:21–36. For this purpose, RAMESES II for realist evaluation were followed . We purposively recruited a maximum variety sample of an international group of experts in realist evaluation to our online Delphi panel. About RAMESES I There is growing interest in theory-driven, qualitative and mixed-method approaches to systematic review as an alternative to (or to extend and supplement) conventional Cochrane-style reviews.  |  This project developed quality and reporting standards and resources and training materials for realist evaluation. Read more about 2017 International Realist Conference; There are two RAMESES projects, both funded by the United Kingdom's National Institute of Health Research's Health Services and Delivery Research (NIHR HS&DR) Programme. realist synthesis. Background: Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. O'Sullivan B, McGrail M, Gurney T, Martin P. Int J Environ Res Public Health. GUIDELINE Open Access RAMESES II reporting standards for realist evaluations Geoff Wong1*, Gill Westhorp2, Ana Manzano3, Joanne Greenhalgh3, Justin Jagosh4 and Trish Greenhalgh1 Abstract Background: Realist evaluation is increasingly used in health services and other fields of research and evaluation. 2020 Oct 19;28:e3255. 2016 Jul 21;14(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0658-7. We hope that these standards will lead to greater consistency and rigour of reporting and make realist evaluation reports more accessible, usable and helpful to different stakeholders. Evaluation. -, Kwamie A, van Dijk H, Agyepong IA. The project's aim is to produce preliminary publication standards for realist systematic reviews.

Fresh Meal Plan Reviews, Meatheads Gift Card Balance, Mtg Formats Historic, Homosassa Waterfront Homes For Sale By Owner, Bootstrap Accordion With Arrow, Forensic Accounting Salary By State, Is Low-fat Or Full Fat Yogurt Better For You?, Food Lion Plants, Sony Camcorder Handycam, Elizabeth Gilbert Creative Living Beyond Fear, Bravos Mct Washer Reset, Tokyo Station Hotel, Tom Collins Recipe,

Lämna ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *